Growth Marketing Manager Interview Scorecard

TL;DR
A scorecard to evaluate Growth Marketing Manager candidates across strategy, execution, data, and collaboration. It helps interviewers rate observable skills and predict the candidate's ability to drive scalable user and revenue growth.
Who this scorecard is for
For hiring managers, growth leads, and recruiters interviewing mid-to-senior Growth Marketing Managers. Use it to structure interviews, calibrate expectations, and compare candidates objectively.
Preview the Scorecard
See what the Growth Marketing Manager Interview Scorecard looks like before you download it.

How to use and calibrate
- Pick the level (Junior, Mid, Senior, or Staff) and adjust anchor examples accordingly.
- Use the quick checklist during the call; fill the rubric within 30 minutes after.
- Or use ZYTHR to transcribe the interview and automatically fill in the scorecard live.
- Run monthly calibration with sample candidate answers to align expectations.
- Average across interviewers; avoid single-signal decisions.
Detailed rubric with anchor behaviors
Growth Strategy
- 1–2: Cannot define target growth metrics or prioritize initiatives; proposals lack measurable goals.
- 3: Defines clear growth goals and a logical prioritization of tactics tied to metrics.
- 4: Creates multi-quarter growth plans with clear KPIs, trade-offs, and resource needs.
- 5: Anticipates market shifts, sets a visionary roadmap, and re-prioritizes to maximize long-term revenue.
Channel Acquisition
- 1–2: Limited channel knowledge; cannot explain acquisition mechanics or past performance.
- 3: Manages core channels with steady execution and basic optimizations.
- 4: Designs and runs multi-channel campaigns tailored to segments and creatives.
- 5: Discovers and scales new high-ROI channels and consistently outperforms benchmarks.
Experimentation & A/B Testing
- 1–2: Rarely runs experiments or uses improper controls and unclear hypotheses.
- 3: Designs experiments with clear hypotheses, tracking, and basic statistical checks.
- 4: Runs high-velocity tests, interprets results, and reliably implements winners.
- 5: Builds a systematic experiment program that drives sustained conversion lifts and learning.
Data & Analytics
- 1–2: Cannot query analytics or misreads basic funnel metrics.
- 3: Uses analytics tools to extract insights, track funnels, and monitor KPIs.
- 4: Builds dashboards, segments users, and ties actions to CAC and LTV.
- 5: Creates attribution and predictive models that guide strategic growth decisions.
Technical Implementation
- 1–2: Cannot explain tracking, tagging, or campaign setup; breaks implementations.
- 3: Manages GTM, tags, and integrations with engineering support.
- 4: Owns tracking plan, ensures data quality, and configures marketing automations.
- 5: Implements scalable event taxonomy and end-to-end automations with minimal engineering help.
Cross-functional Collaboration
- 1–2: Poor stakeholder communication leading to delays or rework.
- 3: Coordinates with product, design, and sales to execute campaigns.
- 4: Leads cross-functional launches, aligns priorities, and resolves trade-offs.
- 5: Influences roadmap, secures resources, and drives company-wide adoption of growth initiatives.
Budget & ROI Management
- 1–2: Loses track of spend and cannot explain CAC or ROI.
- 3: Manages budgets, forecasts spend, and monitors return metrics.
- 4: Optimizes channel mix to improve CAC and ROAS within targets.
- 5: Dynamically reallocates budget to maximize cohort LTV and reduce payback period.
Scoring and weighting
Default weights (adjust per role):
Dimension | Weight |
---|---|
Growth Strategy | 18% |
Channel Acquisition | 18% |
Experimentation & A/B Testing | 16% |
Data & Analytics | 17% |
Technical Implementation | 10% |
Cross-functional Collaboration | 12% |
Budget & ROI Management | 9% |
Final score = weighted average across dimensions. Require at least two “4+” signals for Senior+ roles.
Complete Examples
Growth Marketing Manager Scorecard — Great Candidate
Dimension | Notes | Score (1–5) |
---|---|---|
Growth Strategy | Delivers multi-quarter roadmap showing impact and trade-offs | 5 |
Channel Acquisition | Discovers and scales a new high-ROI channel | 5 |
Experimentation & A/B Testing | Improves conversion rate via systematic experiment program | 5 |
Data & Analytics | Develops attribution model linking spend to LTV | 5 |
Technical Implementation | Ships end-to-end tracking plan and automations independently | 5 |
Cross-functional Collaboration | Aligns teams and secures resources for major launches | 5 |
Budget & ROI Management | Reallocates budget to increase ROI and reduce payback period | 5 |
Growth Marketing Manager Scorecard — Good Candidate
Dimension | Notes | Score (1–5) |
---|---|---|
Growth Strategy | Presents clear quarterly priorities linked to OKRs | 3 |
Channel Acquisition | Runs paid search and social with measurable results | 3 |
Experimentation & A/B Testing | Regular A/B tests with clear learnings applied | 3 |
Data & Analytics | Builds dashboards and segments to inform tests | 3 |
Technical Implementation | Configures tags, tracking, and automation with guidance | 3 |
Cross-functional Collaboration | Communicates clearly and delivers on shared plans | 3 |
Budget & ROI Management | Delivers campaigns within budget and meets target ROAS | 3 |
Growth Marketing Manager Scorecard — No-Fit Candidate
Dimension | Notes | Score (1–5) |
---|---|---|
Growth Strategy | Cannot articulate measurable growth goals | 1 |
Channel Acquisition | Only surface-level familiarity with channels | 1 |
Experimentation & A/B Testing | No A/B tests or poor test design | 1 |
Data & Analytics | Unable to produce funnel metrics from analytics | 1 |
Technical Implementation | Doesn't know tracking basics or campaign setup | 1 |
Cross-functional Collaboration | Misses stakeholder needs and causes rework | 1 |
Budget & ROI Management | Cannot justify or forecast ad spend | 1 |
Recruiter FAQs about this scorecard
Q: Do scorecards actually reduce bias?
A: Yes—when you use the same questions, anchored rubrics, and require evidence-based notes.
Q: How many dimensions should we score?
A: Stick to 6–8 core dimensions. More than 10 dilutes signal.
Q: How do we calibrate interviewers?
A: Run monthly sessions with sample candidate answers and compare scores.
Q: How do we handle candidates who spike in one area but are weak elsewhere?
A: Use weighted average but define non-negotiables.
Q: How should we adapt this for Junior vs. Senior roles?
A: Keep dimensions the same but raise expectations for Senior+.
Q: Does this work for take-home or live coding?
A: Yes. Apply the same dimensions, but adjust scoring criteria for context.
Q: Where should results live?
A: Store structured scores and notes in your ATS or ZYTHR.
Q: What if interviewers disagree widely?
A: Require written evidence, reconcile in debrief, or add a follow-up interview.
Q: Can this template be reused for other roles?
A: Yes. Swap technical dimensions for role-specific ones, keep collaboration and communication.
Q: Can ZYTHR auto-populate the scorecard?
A: Yes. ZYTHR can transcribe interviews, tag signals, and live-populate the scorecard.
See Live Scorecards in Action
ZYTHR is not only a resume-screening took, it also automatically transcribes interviews and live-populates scorecards, giving your team a consistent view of every candidate in real time.