SEO Specialist Interview Scorecard

TL;DR
A focused interview scorecard to evaluate mid-level SEO Specialists across technical craft, content strategy, analytics, and collaboration. It prioritizes measurable behaviors and outcomes to guide consistent hiring decisions.
Who this scorecard is for
Designed for hiring managers, SEO team leads, and recruiters assessing hands-on SEO practitioners. Useful in panel interviews and take-home assessments to align expectations on impact and delivery.
Preview the Scorecard
See what the SEO Specialist Interview Scorecard looks like before you download it.

How to use and calibrate
- Pick the level (Junior, Mid, Senior, or Staff) and adjust anchor examples accordingly.
- Use the quick checklist during the call; fill the rubric within 30 minutes after.
- Or use ZYTHR to transcribe the interview and automatically fill in the scorecard live.
- Run monthly calibration with sample candidate answers to align expectations.
- Average across interviewers; avoid single-signal decisions.
Detailed rubric with anchor behaviors
Technical SEO
- 1–2: Misses or misdiagnoses basic crawl/index issues and cannot interpret Search Console signals.
- 3: Identifies common crawl, index, and canonical problems and recommends standard fixes.
- 4: Performs comprehensive audits, prioritizes technical debt, and implements redirects/canonical rules.
- 5: Designs scalable site architecture, automates technical checks, and mentors others on complex fixes.
On-page Content & Keyword Strategy
- 1–2: Relies on intuition, selects irrelevant keywords, and produces weak meta/content recommendations.
- 3: Conducts keyword research, maps intent to pages, and optimizes titles and meta at a tactical level.
- 4: Creates prioritized content plans based on intent gaps and competitive analysis that drive traffic growth.
- 5: Leads topical authority strategy, aligns content to business goals, and defines measurement for content impact.
Analytics & Data Measurement
- 1–2: Cannot extract actionable metrics from GA/Search Console or misinterprets basic reports.
- 3: Uses Search Console and analytics to track traffic, CTR, and basic conversions and reports trends.
- 4: Builds custom dashboards, segments traffic, and ties SEO changes to business KPIs with experiments.
- 5: Designs measurement frameworks, runs A/B tests for SEO impact, and drives data-informed strategy shifts.
Link Building & Off-page SEO
- 1–2: Leads low-quality outreach or cannot assess link toxicity and value.
- 3: Executes targeted outreach, secures relevant links, and monitors backlink health.
- 4: Builds scalable partnerships, earns high-value links, and manages disavow when needed.
- 5: Creates repeatable authority-building programs, negotiates strategic partnerships, and influences industry linking.
Site Performance & UX (Core Web Vitals)
- 1–2: Unaware of Core Web Vitals or recommends changes that break pages.
- 3: Identifies key performance bottlenecks and suggests practical fixes for load and responsiveness.
- 4: Works with engineers to implement performance optimizations and tracks CWV improvements.
- 5: Integrates performance into roadmap, reduces CLS/LCP at scale, and proves SEO gains from UX changes.
Reporting & Insights Communication
- 1–2: Delivers vague reports with no clear recommendations or prioritization.
- 3: Produces clear performance reports with prioritized next steps for SEO work.
- 4: Translates data into concise action plans for stakeholders and tracks outcomes.
- 5: Creates executive-ready narratives that influence product and marketing decisions based on SEO impact.
Project Management & Cross-functional Collaboration
- 1–2: Fails to coordinate with engineers, content, or product; tasks stall or conflict with roadmaps.
- 3: Manages SEO tasks, follows release processes, and communicates status to relevant teams.
- 4: Owns cross-functional initiatives, negotiates scope, and ensures timely delivery of SEO changes.
- 5: Drives multi-team programs, aligns roadmaps to SEO goals, and removes blockers to deliver measurable results.
Scoring and weighting
Default weights (adjust per role):
Dimension | Weight |
---|---|
Technical SEO | 20% |
On-page Content & Keyword Strategy | 18% |
Analytics & Data Measurement | 17% |
Link Building & Off-page SEO | 15% |
Site Performance & UX | 10% |
Reporting & Insights Communication | 10% |
Project Management & Cross-functional Collaboration | 10% |
Final score = weighted average across dimensions. Require at least two “4+” signals for Senior+ roles.
Complete Examples
SEO Specialist Scorecard — Great Candidate
Dimension | Notes | Score (1–5) |
---|---|---|
Technical SEO | architects scalable URL structures and automated audits | 5 |
On-page Content & Keyword Strategy | defines topical clusters that increase organic visibility | 5 |
Analytics & Data Measurement | links SEO actions to conversions via experiments | 5 |
Link Building & Off-page SEO | establishes partnerships that drive high-authority links | 5 |
Site Performance & UX (Core Web Vitals) | drives cross-team improvements that measurably improve CWV | 5 |
Reporting & Insights Communication | presents insights that change stakeholder priorities | 5 |
Project Management & Cross-functional Collaboration | leads cross-team launches that deliver measurable SEO gains | 5 |
SEO Specialist Scorecard — Good Candidate
Dimension | Notes | Score (1–5) |
---|---|---|
Technical SEO | remediates canonical, robots, and sitemap issues | 3 |
On-page Content & Keyword Strategy | maps keywords to pages and updates meta/content | 3 |
Analytics & Data Measurement | creates dashboards and identifies trend drivers | 3 |
Link Building & Off-page SEO | secures relevant backlinks through targeted outreach | 3 |
Site Performance & UX (Core Web Vitals) | finds and recommends fixes for major performance issues | 3 |
Reporting & Insights Communication | delivers prioritized reports and next steps | 3 |
Project Management & Cross-functional Collaboration | manages SEO tickets and communicates status across teams | 3 |
SEO Specialist Scorecard — No-Fit Candidate
Dimension | Notes | Score (1–5) |
---|---|---|
Technical SEO | cannot identify crawl or indexing errors | 1 |
On-page Content & Keyword Strategy | chooses mismatched keywords | 1 |
Analytics & Data Measurement | misreads core performance reports | 1 |
Link Building & Off-page SEO | relies on low-quality link tactics | 1 |
Site Performance & UX (Core Web Vitals) | ignores or misapplies Core Web Vitals | 1 |
Reporting & Insights Communication | reports lack clear actions | 1 |
Project Management & Cross-functional Collaboration | cannot coordinate changes with engineering or content | 1 |
Recruiter FAQs about this scorecard
Q: Do scorecards actually reduce bias?
A: Yes—when you use the same questions, anchored rubrics, and require evidence-based notes.
Q: How many dimensions should we score?
A: Stick to 6–8 core dimensions. More than 10 dilutes signal.
Q: How do we calibrate interviewers?
A: Run monthly sessions with sample candidate answers and compare scores.
Q: How do we handle candidates who spike in one area but are weak elsewhere?
A: Use weighted average but define non-negotiables.
Q: How should we adapt this for Junior vs. Senior roles?
A: Keep dimensions the same but raise expectations for Senior+.
Q: Does this work for take-home or live coding?
A: Yes. Apply the same dimensions, but adjust scoring criteria for context.
Q: Where should results live?
A: Store structured scores and notes in your ATS or ZYTHR.
Q: What if interviewers disagree widely?
A: Require written evidence, reconcile in debrief, or add a follow-up interview.
Q: Can this template be reused for other roles?
A: Yes. Swap technical dimensions for role-specific ones, keep collaboration and communication.
Q: Can ZYTHR auto-populate the scorecard?
A: Yes. ZYTHR can transcribe interviews, tag signals, and live-populate the scorecard.
See Live Scorecards in Action
ZYTHR is not only a resume-screening took, it also automatically transcribes interviews and live-populates scorecards, giving your team a consistent view of every candidate in real time.