Try Free
InterviewVP of MarketingScorecardHiring

VP of Marketing Interview Scorecard

ZYTHR Resources September 11, 2025

TL;DR

This scorecard provides a concise, role-specific framework to evaluate candidates for a VP of Marketing across strategy, execution, measurement, and leadership. It ensures interviewers rate observable behaviors and outcomes consistently to support data-driven hiring decisions.

Who this scorecard is for

Designed for hiring managers, executive interview panels, and recruiters assessing senior marketing leaders. Useful for tech/company stage-appropriate interviews that require both craft expertise and cross-functional leadership evaluation.

Preview the Scorecard

See what the VP of Marketing Interview Scorecard looks like before you download it.

A ready-to-use VP of Marketing Interview Scorecard template

Download the Scorecard

How to use and calibrate

  • Pick the level (Junior, Mid, Senior, or Staff) and adjust anchor examples accordingly.
  • Use the quick checklist during the call; fill the rubric within 30 minutes after.
  • Or use ZYTHR to transcribe the interview and automatically fill in the scorecard live.
  • Run monthly calibration with sample candidate answers to align expectations.
  • Average across interviewers; avoid single-signal decisions.

Detailed rubric with anchor behaviors

Marketing Strategy

  • 1–2: Cannot articulate a coherent go-to-market plan or links between marketing and business goals.
  • 3: Defines a clear annual strategy tied to target segments and measurable company objectives.
  • 4: Builds differentiated multi-year strategy with prioritized initiatives and clear trade-offs.
  • 5: Creates visionary, adaptable strategy that anticipates market shifts and cascades into team roadmaps.

Demand Generation

  • 1–2: Relies on ad-hoc campaigns with no funnel ownership or repeatable processes.
  • 3: Delivers predictable pipeline through integrated channels and campaign planning.
  • 4: Scales demand with optimized channel mix, cadence, and playbooks for conversion.
  • 5: Drives step-change growth via new acquisition engines and scalable repeatable demand programs.

Brand & Positioning

  • 1–2: Cannot clearly articulate product positioning or target customer value proposition.
  • 3: Defines clear positioning and consistent messaging used across channels.
  • 4: Differentiates brand in market, influences product messaging, and drives awareness metrics.
  • 5: Establishes category or thought leadership positioning that materially shifts market perception.

Analytics & Measurement

  • 1–2: Lacks measurable KPIs or cannot explain outcomes with data.
  • 3: Defines and tracks key metrics (pipeline, CAC, LTV) and reports regularly.
  • 4: Uses experimentation and attribution models to optimize spend and channels.
  • 5: Implements advanced measurement frameworks that reliably predict growth and ROI.

Team Leadership

  • 1–2: Poor team structure or high turnover and limited hiring or development practices.
  • 3: Builds capable team, hires well, and provides regular feedback and goals.
  • 4: Develops leaders, defines clear roles, and improves team productivity and retention.
  • 5: Creates high-performing marketing organization with succession, clear career paths, and strong culture of execution.

Cross-functional Partnership

  • 1–2: Fails to align with sales, product, or executive teams; causes friction.
  • 3: Collaborates with sales and product to align campaigns and GTM execution.
  • 4: Proactively coordinates cross-functional plans and resolves conflicts to accelerate launches.
  • 5: Influences company strategy, secures stakeholder buy-in, and orchestrates major cross-functional initiatives.

Budget & ROI

  • 1–2: Cannot justify spend or track ROI; overspends with little impact.
  • 3: Manages budget to meet targets and reallocates based on performance.
  • 4: Optimizes spend to improve ROI and presents clear business cases for investments.
  • 5: Aligns investment to strategic priorities and consistently demonstrates strong return on marketing spend.

Scoring and weighting

Default weights (adjust per role):

Dimension Weight
Marketing Strategy 20%
Demand Generation 18%
Brand & Positioning 15%
Analytics & Measurement 15%
Team Leadership 12%
Cross-functional Partnership 10%
Budget & ROI 10%

Final score = weighted average across dimensions. Require at least two “4+” signals for Senior+ roles.

Complete Examples

VP of Marketing Scorecard — Great Candidate

Dimension Notes Score (1–5)
Marketing Strategy Multi-year strategy that unlocked new market segments. 5
Demand Generation Built a new channel that doubled qualified pipeline. 5
Brand & Positioning Positioning campaign increased brand awareness and deal velocity. 5
Analytics & Measurement Introduced attribution model that improved spend efficiency. 5
Team Leadership Built a scalable org with low churn and promoted multiple leaders. 5
Cross-functional Partnership Led cross-functional launch that materially increased adoption. 5
Budget & ROI Reallocated budget to double marketing ROI within a year. 5

VP of Marketing Scorecard — Good Candidate

Dimension Notes Score (1–5)
Marketing Strategy Annual strategy linked to revenue and ICP. 3
Demand Generation Consistent quarter-over-quarter pipeline growth. 3
Brand & Positioning Clear positioning reflected in website and sales materials. 3
Analytics & Measurement Regular dashboard tying campaigns to pipeline and CAC. 3
Team Leadership Hired and developed managers who meet goals. 3
Cross-functional Partnership Regular alignment meetings and joint go-to-market plans. 3
Budget & ROI Budget meets targets and shifts to high-performing channels. 3

VP of Marketing Scorecard — No-Fit Candidate

Dimension Notes Score (1–5)
Marketing Strategy No clear GTM plan or target segmentation. 1
Demand Generation Campaigns fail to produce trackable pipeline. 1
Brand & Positioning Messaging is inconsistent and confusing to stakeholders. 1
Analytics & Measurement No tracking or unclear reporting on campaign outcomes. 1
Team Leadership High turnover and unclear org structure. 1
Cross-functional Partnership Poor coordination with sales and product causing missed launches. 1
Budget & ROI Unclear budget ownership and poor ROI tracking. 1

Recruiter FAQs about this scorecard

Q: Do scorecards actually reduce bias?

A: Yes—when you use the same questions, anchored rubrics, and require evidence-based notes.

Q: How many dimensions should we score?

A: Stick to 6–8 core dimensions. More than 10 dilutes signal.

Q: How do we calibrate interviewers?

A: Run monthly sessions with sample candidate answers and compare scores.

Q: How do we handle candidates who spike in one area but are weak elsewhere?

A: Use weighted average but define non-negotiables.

Q: How should we adapt this for Junior vs. Senior roles?

A: Keep dimensions the same but raise expectations for Senior+.

Q: Does this work for take-home or live coding?

A: Yes. Apply the same dimensions, but adjust scoring criteria for context.

Q: Where should results live?

A: Store structured scores and notes in your ATS or ZYTHR.

Q: What if interviewers disagree widely?

A: Require written evidence, reconcile in debrief, or add a follow-up interview.

Q: Can this template be reused for other roles?

A: Yes. Swap technical dimensions for role-specific ones, keep collaboration and communication.

Q: Can ZYTHR auto-populate the scorecard?

A: Yes. ZYTHR can transcribe interviews, tag signals, and live-populate the scorecard.

Download

Choose your format:

Share these templates with your hiring panel to keep everyone aligned.

See Live Scorecards in Action

ZYTHR is not only a resume-screening took, it also automatically transcribes interviews and live-populates scorecards, giving your team a consistent view of every candidate in real time.