VP of Marketing Interview Scorecard

TL;DR
This scorecard provides a concise, role-specific framework to evaluate candidates for a VP of Marketing across strategy, execution, measurement, and leadership. It ensures interviewers rate observable behaviors and outcomes consistently to support data-driven hiring decisions.
Who this scorecard is for
Designed for hiring managers, executive interview panels, and recruiters assessing senior marketing leaders. Useful for tech/company stage-appropriate interviews that require both craft expertise and cross-functional leadership evaluation.
Preview the Scorecard
See what the VP of Marketing Interview Scorecard looks like before you download it.

How to use and calibrate
- Pick the level (Junior, Mid, Senior, or Staff) and adjust anchor examples accordingly.
- Use the quick checklist during the call; fill the rubric within 30 minutes after.
- Or use ZYTHR to transcribe the interview and automatically fill in the scorecard live.
- Run monthly calibration with sample candidate answers to align expectations.
- Average across interviewers; avoid single-signal decisions.
Detailed rubric with anchor behaviors
Marketing Strategy
- 1–2: Cannot articulate a coherent go-to-market plan or links between marketing and business goals.
- 3: Defines a clear annual strategy tied to target segments and measurable company objectives.
- 4: Builds differentiated multi-year strategy with prioritized initiatives and clear trade-offs.
- 5: Creates visionary, adaptable strategy that anticipates market shifts and cascades into team roadmaps.
Demand Generation
- 1–2: Relies on ad-hoc campaigns with no funnel ownership or repeatable processes.
- 3: Delivers predictable pipeline through integrated channels and campaign planning.
- 4: Scales demand with optimized channel mix, cadence, and playbooks for conversion.
- 5: Drives step-change growth via new acquisition engines and scalable repeatable demand programs.
Brand & Positioning
- 1–2: Cannot clearly articulate product positioning or target customer value proposition.
- 3: Defines clear positioning and consistent messaging used across channels.
- 4: Differentiates brand in market, influences product messaging, and drives awareness metrics.
- 5: Establishes category or thought leadership positioning that materially shifts market perception.
Analytics & Measurement
- 1–2: Lacks measurable KPIs or cannot explain outcomes with data.
- 3: Defines and tracks key metrics (pipeline, CAC, LTV) and reports regularly.
- 4: Uses experimentation and attribution models to optimize spend and channels.
- 5: Implements advanced measurement frameworks that reliably predict growth and ROI.
Team Leadership
- 1–2: Poor team structure or high turnover and limited hiring or development practices.
- 3: Builds capable team, hires well, and provides regular feedback and goals.
- 4: Develops leaders, defines clear roles, and improves team productivity and retention.
- 5: Creates high-performing marketing organization with succession, clear career paths, and strong culture of execution.
Cross-functional Partnership
- 1–2: Fails to align with sales, product, or executive teams; causes friction.
- 3: Collaborates with sales and product to align campaigns and GTM execution.
- 4: Proactively coordinates cross-functional plans and resolves conflicts to accelerate launches.
- 5: Influences company strategy, secures stakeholder buy-in, and orchestrates major cross-functional initiatives.
Budget & ROI
- 1–2: Cannot justify spend or track ROI; overspends with little impact.
- 3: Manages budget to meet targets and reallocates based on performance.
- 4: Optimizes spend to improve ROI and presents clear business cases for investments.
- 5: Aligns investment to strategic priorities and consistently demonstrates strong return on marketing spend.
Scoring and weighting
Default weights (adjust per role):
Dimension | Weight |
---|---|
Marketing Strategy | 20% |
Demand Generation | 18% |
Brand & Positioning | 15% |
Analytics & Measurement | 15% |
Team Leadership | 12% |
Cross-functional Partnership | 10% |
Budget & ROI | 10% |
Final score = weighted average across dimensions. Require at least two “4+” signals for Senior+ roles.
Complete Examples
VP of Marketing Scorecard — Great Candidate
Dimension | Notes | Score (1–5) |
---|---|---|
Marketing Strategy | Multi-year strategy that unlocked new market segments. | 5 |
Demand Generation | Built a new channel that doubled qualified pipeline. | 5 |
Brand & Positioning | Positioning campaign increased brand awareness and deal velocity. | 5 |
Analytics & Measurement | Introduced attribution model that improved spend efficiency. | 5 |
Team Leadership | Built a scalable org with low churn and promoted multiple leaders. | 5 |
Cross-functional Partnership | Led cross-functional launch that materially increased adoption. | 5 |
Budget & ROI | Reallocated budget to double marketing ROI within a year. | 5 |
VP of Marketing Scorecard — Good Candidate
Dimension | Notes | Score (1–5) |
---|---|---|
Marketing Strategy | Annual strategy linked to revenue and ICP. | 3 |
Demand Generation | Consistent quarter-over-quarter pipeline growth. | 3 |
Brand & Positioning | Clear positioning reflected in website and sales materials. | 3 |
Analytics & Measurement | Regular dashboard tying campaigns to pipeline and CAC. | 3 |
Team Leadership | Hired and developed managers who meet goals. | 3 |
Cross-functional Partnership | Regular alignment meetings and joint go-to-market plans. | 3 |
Budget & ROI | Budget meets targets and shifts to high-performing channels. | 3 |
VP of Marketing Scorecard — No-Fit Candidate
Dimension | Notes | Score (1–5) |
---|---|---|
Marketing Strategy | No clear GTM plan or target segmentation. | 1 |
Demand Generation | Campaigns fail to produce trackable pipeline. | 1 |
Brand & Positioning | Messaging is inconsistent and confusing to stakeholders. | 1 |
Analytics & Measurement | No tracking or unclear reporting on campaign outcomes. | 1 |
Team Leadership | High turnover and unclear org structure. | 1 |
Cross-functional Partnership | Poor coordination with sales and product causing missed launches. | 1 |
Budget & ROI | Unclear budget ownership and poor ROI tracking. | 1 |
Recruiter FAQs about this scorecard
Q: Do scorecards actually reduce bias?
A: Yes—when you use the same questions, anchored rubrics, and require evidence-based notes.
Q: How many dimensions should we score?
A: Stick to 6–8 core dimensions. More than 10 dilutes signal.
Q: How do we calibrate interviewers?
A: Run monthly sessions with sample candidate answers and compare scores.
Q: How do we handle candidates who spike in one area but are weak elsewhere?
A: Use weighted average but define non-negotiables.
Q: How should we adapt this for Junior vs. Senior roles?
A: Keep dimensions the same but raise expectations for Senior+.
Q: Does this work for take-home or live coding?
A: Yes. Apply the same dimensions, but adjust scoring criteria for context.
Q: Where should results live?
A: Store structured scores and notes in your ATS or ZYTHR.
Q: What if interviewers disagree widely?
A: Require written evidence, reconcile in debrief, or add a follow-up interview.
Q: Can this template be reused for other roles?
A: Yes. Swap technical dimensions for role-specific ones, keep collaboration and communication.
Q: Can ZYTHR auto-populate the scorecard?
A: Yes. ZYTHR can transcribe interviews, tag signals, and live-populate the scorecard.
See Live Scorecards in Action
ZYTHR is not only a resume-screening took, it also automatically transcribes interviews and live-populates scorecards, giving your team a consistent view of every candidate in real time.