Alva Labs + Greenhouse integration: automate assessment invites, transfer scores, and standardize interviews

The Alva Labs integration for Greenhouse connects Alva’s validated assessments—personality, logical reasoning, and coding tests—directly into Greenhouse’s applicant tracking workflow. That integration centralizes assessment assignments, automates candidate status updates, and ensures results appear where hiring teams already work, reducing manual steps and accelerating decision-making. This article explains what the integration does, which hiring teams benefit most, practical setup and implementation considerations, measurable benefits, and limitations to consider when you evaluate Alva Labs for use inside Greenhouse.

In short: the integration turns Alva’s research-backed tests and structured interview templates into actionable signals inside Greenhouse, enabling recruiters and hiring managers to assess cognitive ability, role fit, and coding skill without leaving the ATS. Below you’ll find concrete examples, a checklist for rollout, metrics to track, and objective comparisons to other approaches.

How the Alva–Greenhouse Integration Works (High Level)

• Install and authorize Add the Alva Labs app from Greenhouse’s marketplace and authorize API access so Alva can push assessment invites and pull results.
• Map assessments Map Alva tests (Personality, Logic, Coding) to specific job templates or stages in Greenhouse so invites trigger automatically based on workflow rules.
• Automate invites When candidates reach the mapped stage, Greenhouse triggers an Alva invite; candidates receive a single sign-up link and complete assessments online.
• Results sync Alva returns scores and structured reports to the candidate profile in Greenhouse, often as attachments or custom fields for easy review.
• Structured interviews Use Alva’s interview templates and scores within Greenhouse to guide interviewer questions and to capture standardized ratings.

Core Features Exposed Through the Integration

• Automated assessment assignments Assign specific tests based on job, department, or stage without manual email invites.
• Score and report syncing Candidate test results, percentile ranks, and recommended interview focus areas appear in Greenhouse profiles.
• Interview templates Structured question sets and scoring rubrics populate interviewer instructions in the ATS.
• Coding tests with real-world tasks Developer assessments use scenarios from top companies and are viewable via a single link inside the candidate record.

Who benefits most from the Alva–Greenhouse integration? Hiring teams that need objective, role-aligned signals early in the funnel see the largest gains—particularly teams that hire at scale for technical and non-technical roles, that want to standardize interviews, or that need consistent, research-backed assessments to complement resumes and interviews.

Who Should Consider This Integration

Measurable benefits to expect include faster time-to-offer, reduced time spent on initial screeners, higher signal-to-noise in the shortlist, and more standardized interviewer feedback. The biggest practical improvement is operational: assessments assigned automatically and results centralized in Greenhouse cut administrative handoffs and reduce candidate drop-off caused by slow manual processes.

Implementation Checklist (Practical Steps)

• Confirm licensing and API access Ensure your organization’s Alva and Greenhouse accounts include integration permissions and any necessary admin approvals.
• Define mapping rules Decide which roles get which tests and at which Greenhouse stage they should trigger (e.g., 'Phone Screen' or 'Take-home').
• Set communication templates Customize candidate invitation messaging and reminders to match employer brand and reduce drop-outs.
• Train interviewers Show hiring managers how to read Alva reports and use interview templates to score consistently.
• Pilot and measure Run a short pilot on one role, collect metrics, and adjust mapping and thresholds before a full rollout.

Metrics to Track After Launch

• Time-to-screen completion Average time from assessment invite to completed test; track how automation affects this metric.
• Candidate completion rate Percentage of invited candidates who finish tests—use messaging or timing changes to improve low rates.
• Conversion by assessment score Monitor how candidates in different score bands progress through interviews and offers to validate thresholds.
• Interviewer consistency Compare inter-rater agreement before and after templates to quantify gains in standardized scoring.

Data handling and privacy considerations: the integration exchanges assessment invites and results between Alva and Greenhouse. Confirm data retention policies, storage locations, and access controls with both vendors and your legal/privacy teams. In most deployments, results appear as attachments or custom fields in Greenhouse while raw test logs remain on Alva’s platform—verify what is stored where and for how long.

Practical limitations to consider: Alva provides predictive signals but not a single-source hiring decision; assessments are most effective when combined with interviews and work samples. Some roles require bespoke assessments not covered by Alva’s templates, and integration setup requires admin time and coordination between recruiting operations and IT.

Objective Comparison: Alva Integration vs Manual Screening

Best Practices for Maximum ROI

• Use short, role-relevant tests early 15-minute logic tests or single coding tasks reduce candidate friction while giving predictive information.
• Calibrate score bands to hire outcomes Map historical hires to Alva scores in a pilot to set meaningful thresholds rather than relying on defaults.
• Combine assessments with structured interviews Let Alva scores prioritize candidates and interview templates capture behavioral evidence tied to role requirements.
• Monitor candidate experience Track completion rates and candidate feedback; reduce steps or clarify instructions if drop-off is high.

Common Questions About the Integration