Try Free
Recruiting AutomationATS IntegrationResume Screening

Brainner + Greenhouse Integration: Automated Resume and Pre-Application Screening for High-Volume Hiring

Titus Juenemann June 5, 2024

TL;DR

The Brainner + Greenhouse integration automates resume and pre-application screening by extracting role criteria, assigning weighted scores, and synchronizing results back into Greenhouse. Ideal for high-volume or centralized hiring teams, the integration improves throughput, consistency, and auditability while preserving human judgment through explainable reports. Implement in three steps—sync jobs, configure criteria, analyze results—pilot roles first, track baseline metrics, and use automation rules conservatively to realize time-to-hire and cost-per-hire improvements.

The Brainner integration for Greenhouse automates resume and pre-application screening by extracting role criteria, scoring applicants, and keeping data synchronized between systems. It surfaces which candidates meet specific requirements, ranks applicants on a relevance score, and displays detailed justifications so recruiters can make faster, evidence-backed decisions. This article explains how the integration works, who benefits most, practical setup and rollout tips, measurable outcomes to track, and common implementation patterns across company sizes and regions. Read on for actionable guidance you can apply during a pilot or full deployment.

Core capabilities of the Brainner — Greenhouse integration

  • Two-way sync Jobs, resumes, and pre-application questions flow from Greenhouse into Brainner; actions and evaluation scores are written back to Greenhouse Interview Kits and candidate profiles.
  • Automated scoring Candidates are scored against weighted criteria such as experience, education, certifications and skills, enabling ranked shortlists and objective filtering.
  • Customizable criteria Teams can add, remove or adjust role-specific requirements and assign weights to emphasize what matters most for each job.
  • Automation rules Set rules to automatically advance, reject or flag candidates based on score thresholds or whether critical criteria are met.
  • Explainability Detailed reports show exactly which sections of a resume matched each requirement and why a score was assigned.
  • Regional and language coverage Supports hiring workflows in major regions (North America, EMEA, APAC, South America) and multiple languages, enabling global recruiting teams to use consistent screening logic.

Who should evaluate this integration? Talent acquisition teams that receive large volumes of applications, centralized recruiting centers, high-volume hiring programs (campus, retail, contact centers), and sourcing teams that need consistent, repeatable screening are ideal candidates. It is also useful for hiring managers who want transparent, justifiable shortlists rather than ad-hoc resume filtering. Teams with existing Greenhouse deployments benefit most because the integration preserves the ATS as the system of record while offloading screening work to Brainner—reducing manual reviews without losing the interview workflow or feedback loop already established in Greenhouse.

ZYTHR for Greenhouse – Featured Section
ZYTHR - Your Screening Assistant

AI resume screener for Greenhouse

ZYTHR scores every applicant automatically and surfaces the strongest candidates based on your criteria.

  • Automatically screens every inbound applicant.
  • See clear scores and reasons for each candidate.
  • Supports recruiter judgment instead of replacing it.
  • Creates a shortlist so teams spend time where it matters.
ZYTHR - AI resume screener for Greenhouse ATS
Name Score Stage
Oliver Elderberry
9
Recruiter Screen
Isabella Honeydew
8
Recruiter Screen
Cher Cherry
7
Recruiter Screen
Sophia Date
4
Not a fit
Emma Banana
3
Not a fit
Liam Plum
2
Not a fit

Quick comparison: Manual screening vs Brainner + Greenhouse

Dimension Manual screening Brainner + Greenhouse
Throughput Limited by human reviewers; slow for high volume Processes 100% of applicants automatically and ranks them
Consistency High variability between reviewers Standardized criteria and weighted scoring across roles
Time-to-hire Longer due to queueing and manual triage Reduced significantly; top candidates surfaced instantly
Auditability Notes can be inconsistent; hard to justify rejections Detailed reports and justifications per candidate
Integration with ATS Native in Greenhouse but manual updates required Two-way sync keeps Greenhouse current with Brainner actions

Three-step screening automation workflow with Brainner

  • Sync job from Greenhouse Import job details and pre-application questions; Brainner extracts key role criteria automatically.
  • Configure criteria and weights Adjust or add requirements (years of experience, certifications, skills); assign weights to reflect relative importance.
  • Analyze results and act Use ranked lists, filters, and automation rules to advance, reject or flag candidates; actions update Greenhouse instantly.

Practical implementation tips for a smooth rollout: start with a pilot limited to a few roles with clear, objective criteria (e.g., technical roles with certification requirements). Use historical candidate data to calibrate scoring thresholds and conduct a short blind review comparing human shortlists to Brainner outputs to confirm alignment. Create simple automation rules initially—advance only high-confidence matches and flag borderline scores for human review.

Sample automation rules that save time

  • Auto-reject low fit Automatically reject candidates scoring below a conservative threshold (e.g., bottom 30%) to eliminate clearly misaligned applicants.
  • Auto-advance top matches Advance candidates scoring above a high threshold directly into recruiter review or initial interview scheduling workflows.
  • Flag for manual review If a candidate meets high-priority criteria but has marginal overall score, flag for recruiter review with the reasoning shown.
  • Meet specific must-have Require that certain criteria (e.g., required license) be met; regardless of overall score, reject if missing.

Common questions during evaluation and rollout

Q: How does Brainner handle resumes in different languages?

A: Brainner supports multiple languages and is designed to extract criteria across language-specific resume formats; for uncommon languages validate during pilot and add manual checks as necessary.

Q: Will Brainner replace recruiters?

A: No. Brainner automates screening to surface best-fit candidates and provides transparent justifications; human judgment remains central for interviews and final decisions.

Q: What happens to candidate data in Greenhouse?

A: Candidate actions and evaluation results from Brainner sync back into Greenhouse Interview Kits and profiles, keeping the ATS current as the single system of record.

Key metrics you should track to measure ROI: percent reduction in time spent per resume, number of resumes screened per recruiter per week, change in time-to-hire, interview-to-offer ratio for Brainner-suggested candidates, and cost-per-hire. Use baseline measurements from a prior period to quantify improvements after the integration is enabled.

Security, compliance and privacy considerations: Brainner integrates with Greenhouse without replacing its data governance controls. Ensure you review Brainner’s privacy policy and your organization’s data processing agreements, confirm regional data residency needs, and validate access controls. For regulated roles, document screening rules and maintain explainable justifications from the reports to support audit trails.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

  • Overweighting single criteria Avoid giving one attribute (e.g., years of experience) disproportionate weight; instead define composite measures for core skills and outcomes.
  • Rushing full deployment Pilot on 2–4 roles first to calibrate thresholds and gather stakeholder feedback before scaling.
  • Ignoring explainability Use the detailed candidate reports during hiring manager training so shortlists are trusted and defensible.
  • Not tracking baseline metrics Measure current screening time and quality to properly quantify improvements after rollout.

How different company sizes typically use the integration: small companies (1–100) often enable Brainner to handle generalist hires and scale limited TA teams; mid-market employers (101–1,000) standardize role templates and use automation rules for repeat hiring; large enterprises (1,001+) integrate Brainner into centralized sourcing centers and global hiring programs to ensure consistent screening across countries and languages.

Integration checklist before go-live

Q: Have you aligned scoring criteria with hiring managers?

A: Yes — confirm what constitutes a pass/fail vs. weighted preference and document it in role templates.

Q: Is there a pilot plan with success metrics?

A: Yes — define duration, roles, baseline metrics and acceptance criteria for scale-up.

Q: Are automation rules tested on historical data?

A: Yes — run closed-loop tests using past applicants to validate thresholds and flag false positives/negatives.

Final practical example: A 500-person software company piloted Brainner on engineering and customer success roles. They synced Greenhouse jobs, set a high weight on technical skills and certifications for engineering, and set up an auto-advance for scores above 85. Within four weeks the TA team reduced initial manual screening by 80%, cut average time-to-first-interview by 6 days, and increased the interview-to-offer rate for Brainner-advanced candidates by 15 percent.

Speed up screening and improve accuracy with ZYTHR

If you use Greenhouse and want to compare or complement Brainner-style automation, try ZYTHR — an AI resume screening tool built to save recruiters time and increase resume review accuracy. ZYTHR screens 100% of applicants, provides transparent match reasoning, and integrates with ATS workflows so your team spends less time triaging and more time interviewing top candidates. Request a demo to see live comparisons and estimated time savings.