Try Free
GreenhouseAssessmentsHRTech

HRPeak + Greenhouse Integration Guide: Automate Assessments, Sync Scores, and Enable Stage Gating

Titus Juenemann May 28, 2025

TL;DR

Integrating HRPeak with Greenhouse automates assessment invitations, synchronizes scores into the ATS, and enables stage gating based on objective test results. The combined setup benefits high-volume and distributed hiring teams by improving consistency, reducing manual screening hours and shortening time-to-hire. This guide covers what the integration does, who should use it, a practical implementation checklist, data mappings, KPIs, troubleshooting tips and a short ROI illustration — concluding that organizations gain measurable efficiency and clearer decision evidence by standardizing assessments within Greenhouse.

This guide explains how the HRPeak Online Assessment Center integrates with Greenhouse, what the combined workflow accomplishes, and which HR teams gain the most value. It focuses on objective capabilities, typical implementation steps, measurable benefits, and practical recommendations for rollout. You’ll find concrete examples of data flows, implementation checklists, KPI suggestions, troubleshooting tips, and a short ROI illustration — all aimed at helping hiring teams decide whether to add HRPeak assessments to their Greenhouse recruiting process.

HRPeak is an online assessment platform that centralizes pre-hire evaluation tools — personality inventories, aptitude and technical tests, language assessments, video interviewing, online case studies, role play, project-based evaluation and gamified exams — under a single portal. Its Virtual Assessment Center lets organizations run standardized, repeatable evaluation processes at scale, reducing variance across assessors and locations. Greenhouse is an applicant-tracking system (ATS) widely used for structured recruiting workflows. Integrating HRPeak with Greenhouse allows candidate records and stage transitions in Greenhouse to trigger assessments in HRPeak and, conversely, push assessment results back into the candidate profile in Greenhouse for consolidated decision-making.

What the HRPeak–Greenhouse integration actually does

  • Automated assessment invitations When a candidate reaches a configured stage in Greenhouse (for example, "Assessments"), the integration automatically creates and sends the relevant HRPeak assessment link to the candidate.
  • Result synchronization Completed assessments and scored outputs (numeric scores, competency tags, pass/fail) are pushed back into the candidate’s Greenhouse profile for reviewers and hiring managers to view alongside interview notes and resumes.
  • Stage gating and routing Greenhouse can be configured to move or hold candidates in stages based on HRPeak results (for example, auto-disqualify below a threshold or flag for priority interview).
  • Single source of truth Assessments, scores and assessor comments live with interview feedback in Greenhouse so decision makers don’t need to jump between systems.
ZYTHR for Greenhouse – Featured Section
ZYTHR - Your Screening Assistant

AI resume screener for Greenhouse

ZYTHR scores every applicant automatically and surfaces the strongest candidates based on your criteria.

  • Automatically screens every inbound applicant.
  • See clear scores and reasons for each candidate.
  • Supports recruiter judgment instead of replacing it.
  • Creates a shortlist so teams spend time where it matters.
ZYTHR - AI resume screener for Greenhouse ATS
Name Score Stage
Oliver Elderberry
9
Recruiter Screen
Isabella Honeydew
8
Recruiter Screen
Cher Cherry
7
Recruiter Screen
Sophia Date
4
Not a fit
Emma Banana
3
Not a fit
Liam Plum
2
Not a fit

Typical data mapping between HRPeak and Greenhouse

Greenhouse Field HRPeak Field / Action
Candidate Name / Email Used to create candidate account and send assessment invitations
Application Stage Triggers specific HRPeak assessment package (role-based)
Assessment Status HRPeak sends status updates (Invited, In Progress, Completed, Overdue)
Assessment Score / Tags Numeric scores, competency tags, and qualitative assessor notes returned to Greenhouse
Custom Fields Time-to-complete, attempt count, and integrity flags mapped into candidate custom fields

Implementation checklist (practical sequence)

  • Define assessment blueprint List competencies and tests required per role; choose HRPeak test batteries and pass/fail thresholds.
  • Map Greenhouse stages and triggers Decide which Greenhouse stage will initiate assessments and how results influence stage movement.
  • Configure API/connection Set up secure API credentials between Greenhouse and HRPeak and verify webhook endpoints for status updates.
  • Pilot with a single role Run a 4–6 week pilot on one job family to validate scoring thresholds and candidate experience.
  • Train interviewers and recruiters Share how scores appear in Greenhouse, how to interpret competency tags, and standardize decision rules.
  • Rollout and measure Expand to other roles, monitor KPIs, refine assessments and routing rules.

Who benefits most from this integration

  • High-volume hiring teams When recruiters screen hundreds or thousands of applicants, automated assessments reduce manual review workload and speed throughput.
  • Distributed organizations Companies hiring across multiple locations benefit from standardized, centrally managed assessments and consistent scoring.
  • Technical and language-heavy roles Roles requiring technical tests, coding exercises, or language assessments benefit from HRPeak’s specialized modules.
  • Organizations prioritizing objective evidence Teams that want to reduce subjective variance between interviewers can use scored assessments to surface candidate competency objectively.

Key benefits are measurable and operational: faster candidate screening, more consistent qualification criteria, improved interview-quality because only screened candidates move forward, and reduced time-to-hire when stage transitions are automated. HRPeak claims up to 80% recruitment cost savings in some scenarios by reducing manual screening and concentrating interviewer time on the best-fit candidates. Combined with Greenhouse, HRPeak allows organizations to run the assessment portion of recruitment with global consistency: same tests, same scoring, auditable results. That consistency supports quicker decisions and clearer audit trails for hiring outcomes.

Simple ROI illustration (example per 1000 applicants)

Metric Manual workflow Greenhouse + HRPeak workflow (example)
Average recruiter hours for initial screening 200 hours 40 hours (automated invitations + auto-filtering)
Interview scheduling & coordination 120 hours 60 hours (fewer screened candidates)
Time-to-hire 40 days 18–25 days
Estimated cost reduction Baseline 30–60% (depending on role and volume)

Common questions about integration and usage

Q: Can HRPeak assessments run asynchronously across time zones?

A: Yes. HRPeak’s platform supports on-demand invitations and time-window controls so candidates can take assessments at times that suit their location; statuses are sent back to Greenhouse when completed.

Q: How are candidate privacy and data handled?

A: Assessments use secure storage and transfers; implementers should verify GDPR/CCPA requirements and configure data retention settings in HRPeak and Greenhouse per local regulations.

Q: What happens when a candidate fails an assessment?

A: You can configure automatic disqualification in Greenhouse, flagging for recruiter review, or route to a remediation assessment; it’s configurable based on your hiring rules.

Q: Do assessment scores replace interviews?

A: No. Scores are designed to prioritize and qualify candidates objectively; structured interviews remain important to evaluate fit, communication, and role-specific contexts not captured in tests.

Technical and security considerations matter: use API keys with least-privilege access, enable TLS/HTTPS for webhooks, log transactions for auditability, and set retention policies for candidate assessment data. Ensure your HR and legal teams sign off on data processing agreements and any cross-border transfers before broad rollout. From a performance view, monitor webhook delivery and retry queues so assessment status updates reliably appear in Greenhouse. Plan for rate limits and batch operations if you run very high-volume invitation campaigns.

Best practices for assessment design in HRPeak

  • Start with role-critical competencies Keep test batteries focused on skills that predict on-the-job performance to avoid over-assessing candidates.
  • Use mixed formats Combine objective aptitude tests with project-based tasks or video responses to capture both technical skill and communication.
  • Set and validate thresholds Run a calibration sample of past hires to set realistic pass scores and reduce false negatives or positives.
  • Respect candidate experience Keep total assessment time reasonable, provide clear instructions, and offer a help channel for technical issues.

Screening workflow comparison

Workflow element Manual resume review Greenhouse + HRPeak integration
Initial screening time High (manual reading + bias risks) Low (automated invites + objective scores)
Consistency across roles Low (varies by reviewer) High (standard batteries & scoring)
Scalability Limited (recruiter time is linear with applicants) High (automation scales with volume)
Decision traceability Moderate (notes scattered) High (scores and notes centralized)

Troubleshooting and support tips: if candidates report not receiving invitations, verify email templates, spam settings, and webhook logs. For mismatched results, check mapping of custom fields and score thresholds. Maintain a small pilot group of testers to validate updates to assessment content or integration settings before rolling changes into production. If you hit technical issues, escalate with HRPeak support (logs, API request IDs, and example candidate records will accelerate resolution) and coordinate with your Greenhouse admin to check webhook delivery and permission scopes.

Quick deployment timeline (typical)

  • Week 1: Planning Define roles, select assessment batteries, map triggers and outcomes.
  • Week 2: Configuration Set up API keys, map fields, configure Greenhouse stages and HRPeak test suites.
  • Week 3–4: Pilot Run a controlled pilot with feedback loops, adjust thresholds and messaging.
  • Week 5–6: Rollout Expand to additional roles, train teams, monitor KPIs and fine-tune.

Adopting HRPeak with Greenhouse modernizes and standardizes the assessment stage of hiring: it reduces manual screening effort, increases throughput, and provides structured assessment evidence inside your ATS. For teams with large applicant volumes or roles that require objective skills validation, this integration materially improves process efficiency and decision clarity. Pairing automated assessment platforms with accurate resume screening upstream maximizes value by ensuring only relevant candidates reach the assessment stage, reducing candidate fatigue and assessment costs.

Speed up screening and improve accuracy with ZYTHR

Complement HRPeak assessments by using ZYTHR’s AI resume screening to prioritize the best-fit applicants before sending invitations. ZYTHR saves recruiter hours and increases review accuracy, helping you route higher-quality candidates into Greenhouse stages that trigger HRPeak assessments — reducing time-to-hire and focusing assessment effort where it matters.