PerchPeek + Greenhouse Integration Guide: Relocation Automation, ROI, and Implementation
Titus Juenemann •
April 18, 2024
TL;DR
This guide covers what the PerchPeek–Greenhouse integration does, who should use it, and the measurable advantages it delivers. It explains core capabilities—automatic case creation, two-way syncing, live relocator progress and cost breakdowns—plus implementation steps, data field mappings and ROI examples (including up to 70% reported cost reductions and savings of as much as $24k per relocator). Practical recommendations, security considerations and a decision checklist help HR and TA teams determine fit. Conclusion: organizations with recurring cross-border hires, centralized mobility programs or a need for standardized relocator experiences will see the most value from this integration.
This article explains how the PerchPeek integration for Greenhouse streamlines relocation workflows inside your applicant tracking system, what data and triggers it connects, and the measurable benefits teams can expect. It is written for talent acquisition, mobility, and HR operations leaders evaluating automation options for global hiring and onboarding.
Read on for practical implementation steps, sample workflows, data field mappings, ROI examples and a decision checklist to determine whether the PerchPeek–Greenhouse integration is the right fit for your company size and mobility needs.
Core capabilities of the PerchPeek–Greenhouse integration
- Two-way candidate syncing Synchronize candidate identity, contact details and relocation status between Greenhouse and PerchPeek so both recruitment and mobility teams see a single source of truth.
- Trigger-based case creation Automatically open a PerchPeek relocation case when a candidate reaches a designated Greenhouse stage (for example, 'Offer Accepted' or 'Hired').
- Live relocator progress Surface PerchPeek’s live visibility data—progress milestones, cost estimates and categorized spend breakdowns—back into Greenhouse or linked records for quicker oversight.
- Standardized data fields Map structured relocation inputs (destination, start date, compensation elements, lump sum details) to Greenhouse fields to reduce manual entry and errors.
- No partner implementation fee PerchPeek lists no partner implementation fee for the Greenhouse integration, simplifying the procurement decision and lowering upfront barriers to adoption.
- Global coverage and localized support Integration supports PerchPeek’s RMC capabilities across >150 countries with language and region-aware services suitable for APAC, EMEA, North and South America.
AI resume screener for Greenhouse
ZYTHR scores every applicant automatically and surfaces the strongest candidates based on your criteria.
- Automatically screens every inbound applicant.
- See clear scores and reasons for each candidate.
- Supports recruiter judgment instead of replacing it.
- Creates a shortlist so teams spend time where it matters.
| Name | Score | Stage |
|---|---|---|
| Oliver Elderberry |
9
|
Recruiter Screen |
| Isabella Honeydew |
8
|
Recruiter Screen |
| Cher Cherry |
7
|
Recruiter Screen |
| Sophia Date |
4
|
Not a fit |
| Emma Banana |
3
|
Not a fit |
| Liam Plum |
2
|
Not a fit |
Common data fields synced between PerchPeek and Greenhouse
| PerchPeek Field | Greenhouse Field / Notes |
|---|---|
| Candidate ID / Personal details | Mapped to Greenhouse candidate profile; used as primary key for sync |
| Relocation status (case opened, in progress, completed) | Updated in Greenhouse or via a link in the candidate record to provide live visibility |
| Destination country / city | Stored in Greenhouse custom field to inform onboarding and visa workflows |
| Estimated relocation cost & breakdowns | Pushed to Greenhouse as summary data or link to full PerchPeek cost report |
| Lump sum / core-flex model settings | Mapped to offer attributes or compensation fields in Greenhouse |
| Relocator app access and coach assignment | Stored as notes or attributes for HR and hiring managers to reference |
Who should consider this integration: companies with frequent cross-border hires, centralized mobility teams, or distributed recruiters who need live relocation visibility. It’s particularly useful for organizations that manage lump-sum allowances, have internal mobility programs, or want to standardize relocator experiences across regions and company sizes from 1-100 to 10,000+.
Implementation steps to deploy PerchPeek with Greenhouse
- Scope your use cases Decide which Greenhouse stages or offer events should trigger relocation case creation (e.g., offer accepted, candidate hired).
- Map fields Define the custom fields in Greenhouse that will capture PerchPeek inputs (destination, lump sum amounts, approver).
- Configure API access Set up API credentials between Greenhouse and PerchPeek according to the developer docs and support pages.
- Pilot with a cohort Run a small pilot (5–20 hires) across a region to validate data flows and the relocator experience.
- Train recruiters and mobility teams Provide short playbooks and a checklist so recruiters know when and how the integration will act automatically.
- Measure and iterate Track time saved on data entry, relocation cycle times and cost changes to tune triggers and partner selections.
Typical workflow example: a recruiter marks a candidate as 'Offer Accepted' in Greenhouse; the integration creates a PerchPeek case and assigns a relocation coach; PerchPeek provides a cost estimate and tracks milestones (visa, move date, accommodation); updates are sent back to Greenhouse so hiring managers and HR see progress without leaving the ATS. This removes manual handoffs and centralizes status reporting.
ROI signals and measurable benefits
| Metric | Practical impact |
|---|---|
| Relocation cost reduction | PerchPeek reports up to 70% reduction in relocation costs and up to $24k saved per relocator vs traditional services through automation and preferred partners. |
| Time saved on administrative work | Automatic case creation and field sync remove repetitive data entry for recruiters and mobility coordinators, reducing cycle times and errors. |
| Consistent relocator experience | Centralized coaching and a 12-month relocator app experience reduce ad hoc support and improve handoffs across countries. |
| Visibility and compliance | Live visibility of progress and categorized spend helps finance and HR reconcile relocation spend and policy adherence faster. |
Security, privacy and support considerations
- Privacy policy alignment Review PerchPeek’s privacy policy and Greenhouse support docs to ensure data handling, retention and transfer meet your compliance requirements.
- Role-based access Limit who can see relocation financials in Greenhouse via role-based permissions to protect sensitive compensation data.
- Audit trails Confirm that both platforms log changes and API access for traceability during audits.
- Support channels Use PerchPeek’s developer resources and the Greenhouse support page for troubleshooting; PerchPeek lists no partner implementation fee which simplifies vendor engagement.
Frequently asked questions
Q: Does the integration require manual data entry after setup?
A: No—once API credentials and field mappings are configured, most events (stage changes, offers) trigger automatic syncing. Some organizations keep manual override options for exceptional cases.
Q: Can PerchPeek handle different relocation models (lump sum, managed services)?
A: Yes. PerchPeek supports managed lump-sum and core-flex models and the integration maps those settings into Greenhouse so offer documents and compensation fields remain consistent.
Q: What regions and company sizes are supported?
A: PerchPeek operates in over 150 countries and lists suitability for companies ranging from small teams to enterprise (1-100 through 10,000+).
Q: Is there a cost to implement the integration?
A: PerchPeek indicates no partner implementation fee for Greenhouse, though customers should budget internal implementation and change-management effort.
Best practices to maximize value: start with a limited-scope pilot, standardize the fields used for relocation data in Greenhouse, and adopt PerchPeek’s reporting outputs into regular mobility and finance reviews. Pair the integration with preferred local partners and the managed lump-sum model to capture the greatest cost and time efficiencies.
When not to use the integration (limitations)
- Low-volume domestic hires If you only hire locally with minimal relocation needs, the overhead of an integration may not justify the ROI.
- Highly bespoke relocation packages Extremely bespoke, manual relocation arrangements that require continuous custom negotiation may still need significant human coordination outside of automated workflows.
- Strict local data residency restrictions If data residency laws prevent cross-platform transfers in your jurisdiction, consult legal and compare local deployment options before enabling syncs.
Decision checklist: If you require consistent relocator experiences across regions, need live visibility of relocation spend, want to reduce manual handoffs between Talent and Mobility, and plan to scale cross-border hiring, the PerchPeek–Greenhouse integration is likely a high-impact investment. If not, prioritize lightweight processes or revisit when cross-border volume increases.
Speed up hiring decisions and improve screening accuracy with ZYTHR
While PerchPeek streamlines relocation logistics, ZYTHR automates resume screening inside your ATS to save recruiters time and surface the right candidates faster. Try ZYTHR to reduce screening hours, improve match accuracy and ensure every candidate passed to PerchPeek is already a verified fit.